Giant Beechcraft 18 TOTAL CRASH, scale RC airplane, 2020

17 Comments

1. Velká škoda. To je to ne maketové létání 🙁

2. it will mend lads

3. Nice moment!!!! A model this size is unnecessary ond dangerous…. That s the compensation law, big plane, tiny brain… And tiny onother thing ….

4. So you build a dirty great big expensive aeroplane and then fly it like a 3D Fun Fly???? Ask yourself this when you fly a serious RC aircraft. First, if you could scale yourself down and get in it, would you feel safe flying it. Secondly, would you try aerobatics like this without planning and margins for error. The RC fraternity is riddled with poor attitude toward safety, as can be seen here, but one day someone one the ground wont be so lucky. And the spectators clapped?! Unbelievable.

5. sad to lose such a beautiful aircraft

6. 😟😞😞😞

7. That was close… The photographer is one lucky guy..

8. some INFO. ramy (the clueless), likes to make big models of BigFat Cargo planes, while Not understanding that a Tiny bigfat cargo plane WILL still 'fly like' a Cargo plane !!!!! like all other scratch-builders, he does not understand the NEED to change certain things, when a full-size design is scaled-down. this puts him, squarely, in the group of model builders who have made an accurate, scale copy of an aircraft, and end up owning/flying a MODEL aircraft that is Flawed.
   in order for their designs to not continue to be Crappy, scratch model makers MUST learn to see the Proportions, of a full-size aircraft design; PROPORTIONS do not change, in a scale-down!!!! ( this is the reason that a scale-UP, based on Dimensions, does NOT work. )
   hobbyists also Need to comprehend Distribution of Mass and center of mass (dom; c-m)
   hobbyists Need to See the DETAILS, in ga designs. details like, the MINIMIZATION of the Amount of Mass, located aft of the c-m. see the use of Minimal structure in a tail boom and stabs.!!!
   https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/media/cessna-150.25191/full
   while the c-m can be said to be in a single place, it is best to consider the c-m to be a side-ways, teardrop-shaped volume Within the fuselage. (if interested, see my tutorials. or, in general, in a correctly designed aircraft, the exact c-m Will be located where a pilot would be.) center of mass c-m
   https://s3.amazonaws.com/assets.flitetest.com/article_images/medium/truecg-jpg_1384168691.jpg
   an OPTIMAL dom does not Just happen. it is PLANNED. eg., the mass of control components/servos should NOT be added to an airframe, aft of the c-m. All such mass should, INITIALLY, be located Near where the c-m is SUPPOSED to be.
   in order to design/make a good (model) wing, it is essential to comprehend the Differences between full-size and lesss-than full-size wings. the differences are greatest, in the context of Reynolds numbers (re#). in an re#, various (environmental) factors are integrated. in the case of a less-than full-size aircraft, two factors — airspeed and wing size/chord/area — are Always Low. the result is that Any less-than full-size wing has a LOW re#. clark Knew all this, when he Designed the (low-re#) clark-y profile !!! this is why the clark-y is the GoTo profile, for models.! googletranslate

9. What a beautiful model,flying so well .Please remember that B 18 is a transport plane not designed for aerobatics…So sorry for you and hoping a fast repair .Thank you anyway for the show. Djakuyem pecne!Ahoj do Francie !

10. So very sad but this is how we learn not to do it again.
    Shalom, Shalom

11. Да…жаль……………….

12. Bad luck and lessons learned…. he will never do it again. Fortunately nobody injured except the pilot's pride.

13. Idiot

14. You shouldn’t go into a loop without planning!

15. Good no one got hurt.
    🙄😬👍

16. That happens so often even in full scale aviation demo flights, starting a loop too close to the ground is never good and always pilot error. Such a shame!

17. It's the fate of every rc model.
    Bigger the model more problems with your wife.

Comments are closed.